Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

A forum for discussion and criticism of specialized topics relevant (pro and con) to Intelligent Design (ID) -- design detection, design specification, irreducible complexity, origin of life, platonic forms, design matrix, population genetics, cybernetic theories, semiotic theories, Fishers's fundamental theorem, Kimura's neutral evolution, Darwinian evolution, modern synthesis, probability theories, fine tuning, typology, discontinuity systematics, steganography, evolutionary algorithms, published ID material, ID philosophy, front loaded evolution, omega point theory, anthropic principles, multiverses and many-worlds, panspermia, extra terrestrials, teleology in biology, redundant complexity and fault tolerance, algorithmic complexity, complexity measures, no free lunch, blindwatchmakers, bad design, evil design, junk DNA, DNA grammars, von Neumann replicators vs. autocatalysis, Quines, polyconstrained DNA, Mendel's Accountant, DNA skittle, re-association kinetics, molecular clocks, GGU/GID models, enigma of consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, Turing machines, Lenski's bacteria, thermodynamics, Avida, self organization, self disorganization, generalized entropy, Cambrian explosion, genetic entropy, Shannon information, proscriptive information, Programming of Life, law of large numbers, etc.

Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Postby mycorrhizae » Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:17 am

I had this emailed to me just a couple days back. It's a fascinating interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig retired from the Max-Planck Institute and the years of political and religious gaming on the part of the Darwinian Ideologically driven opposers.

Image

Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig is a prominent name in the science world, and until his retirement in 2008, continued to contribute to the science world with his studies at Max-Planck Institute. His articles were published in various articles and is in the board of a peer-reviewed scientific journal Bio-Complexity. He was interviewed by many publications including Der Spiegel and in addition to attending seminars and conferences on a frequent basis as a sought-after speaker, he has written several books on the evidence pointing to flaws in evolutionary theory, and also one about how the science world is pressured into believing in Darwinist theories.


What do you think can be done to overcome this prejudice against any idea that is not Darwinian?

Free and open discussion without any persecution and repression of dissenting biologists. According to Neo-Darwinism all important problems of the origin of species are, at least in principle, solved. Further questions on the validity of evolutionary theory are thus basically superfluous. However, such a dogmatic attitude stops further investigations and hinders fruitful research in science. The scientific ID-theory, in contrast, follows the evidence wherever it leads and several of its predictions have already been found to be true, as for example, the refutation of the junk-DNA-hypothesis during the last few years. The irreducibly complex and specified systems in biology overwhelmingly point to an intelligent origin of living beings. Almost every day further complex such systems are discovered in biological research.


Here is the March 22, 2014 article's link on Diplomacy Post:

http://dippost.com/2014/03/22/interview-with-wolf-ekkehard-lonnig/



-
mycorrhizae
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:00 am

Re: Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Postby johnspenn » Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:11 am

From the interview: "According to Neo-Darwinism all important problems of the origin of species are, at least in principle, solved. Further questions on the validity of evolutionary theory are thus basically superfluous. However, such a dogmatic attitude stops further investigations and hinders fruitful research in science."

Blind faith in the religion of darwinism is a science stopper.
johnspenn
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Postby Barb » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:27 am

Interestingly enough, he is one of Jehovah's Witnesses. A few of his statements have appeared in special issues of the Awake! magazine dealing with science and/or evolution.
Barb
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:16 pm


Return to Intelligent Design

cron