A forum for discussion and criticism of specialized topics relevant (pro and con) to Creation Science - fossil dating, flood geology, C14, K/Ar, radio metric dating, diffusion dating, racemization dating, DNA dating, stellar and planetary evolution, erosion dating, fast stratification, interpretations of the geological column, baraminology, distant starlight problem, Y-chromosomal Adam/Noah/Aaron/Abraham, mitochondrial Eve, Tower of Babel, Proton-21 laboratory, Sodom and Gomorrah, OEC,YEC, Progressive creation, white hole cosmology, Carmeli cosmology, VSL theories, alternate electrodynamics, mantle plume theories, folding rock theories, RATE work, planetary magnetism, faint young sun paradox, moon recession, ocean mineral saturation, astrometry and proper motion surveys, very long baseline interferometry, CMBR, moon evolution, cosmological vs. non-cosmological red shifts, polonium halos, Hydro Plates and Castastrophic Plates, varves, tree rings, noah's ark, over thrusts, lithification, hydrologic sorting, canopy theory, crater theory, planetary heating, ancient civilizations, Atlantis, trophical trees in the arctic, woolly mammoths and tropical trees in Siberia, UFOs and creationism, comets and orbital mechanics, planet satellite capture problems, planetary rings, origin of folded rocks, the Grand Canyon, the Green River valley, the Three Sisters, mountain formation, seafloor formation, tectonics, etc.
by stcordova » Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:27 pm
One exercise I found helpful in persuading college students about the falsehoods of evolutionary theory is to get them to research the questions themselves or ask fellow students or ask (if they are clever and brave) professors they know (preferably after they've gotten through the class).
This thread is for collecting some good questions to ask and recording the effectiveness of the questions. I've found some questions that I once thought were good, turned out not to be so good. There have been lists before like:
But I want to revise and improve on that list and even include Noah's flood type questions.
Last edited by
stcordova on Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
stcordova
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:41 am
by stcordova » Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:31 pm
-
stcordova
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:41 am
by stcordova » Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:58 pm
-
stcordova
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:41 am
by stcordova » Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:18 am
-
stcordova
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:41 am
by tjguy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:39 am
-
tjguy
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:22 am
by tjguy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:43 am
Could some or much of the so called evidence in genetics interpreted to support common descent actually be nothing more than convergent degeneration?
Couldn't creationists use the argument of convergence to our advantage as evolutionists do?
-
tjguy
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:22 am
by stcordova » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:10 pm
-
stcordova
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:41 am
by T.S.Erik » Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:39 am
I remember the heart question on UD, and it had all the "greats" like Alan Fox, Liddle, et al. stumbling and stammering attempting to reason how transitions could occur whilst still have a viable organism each step of the way.
I would certainly agree on this example. I would also agree one cannot shove it down student's throats and guiding them subtly toward their own investigation. Especially at that age they simply know everything and anyone who tries to say otherwise is "the man keeping them down."
Depending on how technical one wishes to get, a good option could be on the shortcomings seen in population genetics. A read through the fairly recent, "Science and Human Origins" (Ann Gauger, Douglas Axe, Casey Luskin. 2012) will provide an entire semester's worth of questions.
-
T.S.Erik
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:45 pm
Return to Creation Science